Child Health Warnings Ignored by Experts & Media

Cerebral palsy... measles... leukemia... epilepsy... juvenile diabetes... arthritis... hemophilia... ear, nose & throat diseases... skin conditions... deafness... vision disorders... not safe for use during pregnancy... autism... SIDS... - all listed on manufacturer literature which seems to be hidden in plain sight. It's there, it's available yet few read it. The exemptions inplace stem from this fact; it is clearly available and up to the parent to decide to take the risk. Yet it's not really a choice, is it?

This list is the BEGINNING of the list of warnings that health researchers and other professionals have warned of for oever 200 years. The full list is too extensive to share in one article. In fact, the full list of references for the single package insert which most doctors have never read is not only comprehensive but includes dire warnings against the use of this one medication, which are still not followed prior to even assessing the individual for suitability.

The Murdoch Institute in Australia, a research organization affiliated with the family that oversees various media outlets, is engaged in studies involving this medication and their effects on pregnant women. This occurs in the context of ongoing concerns and an increase in reported cases of spontaneous abortion, commonly referred to as miscarriage, among this population.

SIDS research is one of the numerous entities to spring up as a side effect of vaccine reactions. There is a belief among some that the underlying cause is known. So-called Children's Hospitals and research institutes are often accused of obscuring the truth while seeking alternative explanations. The focus shifts to anything but the actual cause.

Death following administration of this medication is cited as an 'unknown cause,' which some interpret as a euphemism for a cover-up by pharmaceutical companies. This perception is also prevalent in other fields, such as cancer and HIV research.

Today's media is in a repeat frenzy with headlines about 'measles outbreaks.' They overlook the fact that measles cases today are seldom 'wild' or natural. Instead, there is widespread anger directed at those who are unvaccinated, rather than those who have contracted measles from those who have been recently vaccinations. Manufacturers list atypical or non-wild measles as a side effect, but the media tends to ignore these details.

Type I diabetes is frequently described as being present from birth, even though it is seldom diagnosed until the child is a few years old. By that time, they have usually received their first dose, and their pancreas has experienced one or more episodes of pancreatitis, progressing towards the inability to produce insulin naturally. Similar to SIDS, there is 'no known cause'. The individual will still require needles, leading to ongoing challenges. So, why is type I always attributed to being present 'from birth'?

Similarly, haemophilia is considered to be genetic. Vaccine-related damage is often hereditary due to the MTHFR gene abnormality, which has not yet been tested or used as a basis for exemption from receiving this live substance. Instead of conducting MTHFR gene testing at birth, there is more financial incentive to vaccinate every child immediately. Inquire with your doctor about this mutation; it is likely they are either unaware of it or not interested in learning about it.

Thrombocytopænia often precedes hæmophilia, and when detected after extensive testing on the infant, it is labeled as a separate disease instead of focusing on the underlying cause. Despite this, the patient will still undergo additional needle procedures, even requiring clotting factors to endure unnecessary injections.

Leukæmia in infants has reached unprecedented levels, especially since this medication became a standard requirement for infants rather than an option. Both lymphadenopathy and leukocytosis indicate that the lymphatic system is compromised, serving as precursors to leukæmia. However, the situation of infants now diagnosed and hospitalized will be leveraged to persuade the public to receive the same vaccination to 'protect' them, as their immune systems are permanently damaged. These patients will be exposed to treatments that generate what we recognize as 'cancer', often resulting in high mortality rates as a side effect. Yet, instead of investigating the cause or exploring alternative treatments, we continue to hear the call to 'help us find a cure', with enormous sums invested in ineffective research. This research will once again overlook the actual cause.

Juvenile arthritis is often described as having no known cause. However, the package insert acknowledges otherwise, drawing from extensive research that is claimed not to exist (see the highlighted references in the insert above). My first professional encounter with juvenile arthritis occurred during a house call, where a mother initially observed inflammatory symptoms in her infant. She didn't recognize the connection between the recent pædiatric visit and her child's eventual crippling condition, despite the child's previous athletic potential. Once this suggestion was made, she no longer sought my assistance. The family eventually moved overseas for 'specialist' treatment as their daughter's health declined when steroids ceased to be effective.

During my nursing training, I experienced my first case of myalgia. I encountered many more cases than I care to remember. These patients were often labeled as malingerers or hypochondriacs due to the lack of available answers and relief. They frequently ended up being what we would now refer to as opioid addicts or suicide cases. I realised the pattern that no one else seemed to want to acknowledge; they had all developed pain-related symptoms at an early age, following their childhood vaccines.

Arthritis has also benefited large pharmaceutical companies, with many treatments (anti-inflammatories) not only being recalled but also causing significant harm to the digestive system and vital organs, such as ulcers and cancers. However, by the time a final diagnosis is made, focus has conveniently shifted away from the original cause, which occurred several decades earlier.

SIDS, seizures, encephalitis, various scleroses (such as MS), paralyses, convulsions, ataxias, palsies (including cerebral and bulbar), and neuropathies—numerous diagnoses—have historically been included in package literature, even though they are unlikely to be officially recognized as such. This is because it is often more profitable to gather funds for isolated 'research' that diverts attention from the underlying cause. The chasm between a victim, alert medical or pharmaceutical professional - and 'research' outcomes is vast and impenetrable.

What else would you anticipate when you are not only being exposed to the live virus rather than encountering it 'wild' in the real world, but it is also being injected into you, specifically to bypass natural immune responses?

And when so-called experts assert that no aborted fœtal cells are being injected into your children, surely they should be referred to the package inserts that list them as the medium in which the vaccines are developed? When combined with chicken embryo and calf cells, what could any sensible, educated person think will happen to their children's DNA?

Clear warnings to never give to pregnant females are now seemingly disregarded, as the Murdoch Institute and other entities advertises behind toilet doors in shopping centres, child health centres, hospitals, and medical waiting rooms. Where does the chain of responsibility and liability end? Who is accountable when these trusting, albeit uninformed, women lose their babies after calling the number on these posters? Has any woman ever been advised to avoid this during pregnancy? Who is responsible for this lack of professional accountability? If the warning exists and doctors are unaware, what hope is there for the newly trained vaccinators administering these shots without having read a single package insert?

Regarding the complicity of doctors, has anyone ever been advised against using the MMR vaccine for someone with cerebral palsy or any brain injury? The warnings clearly mention this. Furthermore, there are currently NO exemptions available. This includes known cerebral injuries and even individuals with a history of epilepsy or a family history of epilepsy. Today, no child is screened for a pre-existing fever before receiving the vaccine.

Many people today experience skin conditions, ranging from mild cases like eczema and dermatitis or occasional rashes to psoriasis and severe skin disorders. These issues are often said to be associated with this medication, though such claims are frequently dismissed as myths. I have never encountered anyone being asked about an antibiotic allergy before receiving the injection. However, I have observed doctors and less experienced vaccinators disregarding the worries of parents who have antibiotic allergies and suspect their children might as well.

I have yet to hear of any young woman being cautioned that arthralgia or arthritis can be triggered up to four weeks after receiving the injection. If this is known among young women, it is entirely possible that it is because young schoolgirls have been the basis of Merck's research for many years. If that's the case, what about other age groups? If someone visits a GP with joint pain, they are typically given ibuprofen or anti-inflammatories and sent on their way without further follow-up.

Currently, medical students are not taught that a single case of well-managed measles provides lifelong immunity. Instead of supporting someone through what is essentially a simple childhood illness, the preference seems to be towards sickness and death.

Meningitis is often perceived as a highly contagious condition that can be fatal quickly, typically transmitted through the inhalation of contaminated water. In reality, the meninges serve as a nearly impenetrable barrier, and for any infection to ascend from the nose, eyes, ears, or other body parts, the brain barrier must be breached or chemically altered. Vaccines include adjuvants that temporarily open the blood-brain barrier, permitting a brief period of infection. It is concerning and questionable that meningitis is a KNOWN side effect, yet it is not thoroughly investigated in research. This is particularly troubling when meningitis/meningococcal vaccination campaigns are launched in response to a single case, especially given the existence of several meningitis vaccines.

Pneumonia is a frequent side effect, which refers to an inflammation of the lungs that can occur as a complication following vaccination. In addition to pneumonia, another common side effect is the appearance of a rash.

How many die annually from pharma error?

ENT specialists & pædiatricians were virtually nonexistent 50 years ago. Today, they are a necessity, due to the widespread nature of ENT issues among vaccinated kids. Deafness has been attributed to rubella or German measles, with many horror stories shared, yet it is also a side effect of administering the vaccine to infants. This goes largely unmentioned. Few people are aware that young schoolgirls were involved in a large-scale study on Rubella, or that every vaccinated individual is part of an ongoing study. When I was a child, out of a school of 400 students, perhaps only 2 wore glasses.

Today, every classroom includes children who require prescription glasses. Many have undergone surgery to correct squints. Optical and retinal disorders are another consequence of the vaccine industry, which continues to seek more funding for 'research' into cures. Vision impairment and blindness were once rare, but now they are anticipated with age, and people accept this as normal.

Warnings are acknowledged but often disregarded and not pursued further. The fundamental list of neurological harm attributed to this one medication resembles a horror story, one that many lack the courage to confront. It is simpler to accept the claim it is safe and effective, even though the package insert acknowledges it is neither. Science enthusiasts often dismiss the package insert as inaccurate, insisting it must be legally documented and that such events do not truly occur. In doing so, they effectively dismiss every instance of vaccine-related harm or fatality throughout history.

This information is thoroughly documented, researched, and publicly accessible. Unfortunately, only a few people are interested in uncovering the truth, and even fewer are concerned that Merck, the manufacturer, has faced legal challenges for falsifying research, deception, and cover-ups for years. Despite this, there hasn't been a recall or ban on the products they've misrepresented. Few are bothered by the existence of sealed documents, labeled merely as "unpublished data from the files of Merck Research Laboratories." Similar to the FBI, they can legally safeguard their intellectual property while largely avoiding prosecution.

The cleverness lies in the phrasing—death from unknown or unrelated causes is often the preferred choice. Notably, the term SUDDEN INFANT DEATH SYNDROME was explicitly listed on the DTP packaging, at least as recently as 2017. The ingredients haven't changed, so how could the side effects? Those who dismiss the idea that it is linked to SIDS are most likely unable to read the euphemisms used to describe the symptoms; the wording can be changed to something less incriminating and if the package insert isn't mentioned, it's considered acceptable.

It's not.

REFERENCES:

1. Plotkin, S.A.; Cornfeld, D.; Ingalls, T.H.: Studies of immunization with living rubella virus: Trials in children with a strain cultured from an aborted fetus, Am. J. Dis. Child. 110: 381-389, 1965.

2. Plotkin, S.A.; Farquhar, J.; Katz, M.; Ingalls, T.H.: A new attenuated rubella virus grown in human fibroblasts: Evidence for reduced nasopharyngeal excretion, Am. J. Epidemiol. 86: 468-477, 1967.

3. Johnson, C.E.; et al: Measles Vaccine Immunogenicity in 6- Versus 15-Month-Old Infants Born to Mothers in the Measles Vaccine Era, Pediatrics, 93(6): 939-943, 1994.

5. Linneman, C.C.; et al: Measles Immunity After Vaccination: Results in Children Vaccinated Before 10 Months of Age, Pediatrics, 69(3): 332-335, March 1982.

6. Stetler, H.C.; et al: Impact of Revaccinating Children Who Initially Received Measles Vaccine Before 10 Months of Age, Pediatrics 77(4): 471-476, April 1986.

7. Hilleman, M.R.; Buynak, E.B.; Weibel, R.E.; et al: Development and Evaluation of the Moraten Measles Virus Vaccine, JAMA 206(3): 587-590, 1968.

8. Rosen, L.: Hemagglutination and Hemagglutination-Inhibition with Measles Virus, Virology 13: 139-141, January 1961.

9. Freestone, D.S.; Reynolds, G.M.; McKinnon, J.A.; Prydie, J.: Vaccination of schoolgirls against rubella. Assessment of serological status and a comparative trial of Wistar RA 27/3 and Cendehill strain live attenuated rubella vaccines in 13-year-old schoolgirls in Dudley, Br. J. Prev. Soc. Med. 29: 258-261, 1975.

10. Grillner, L.; Hedstrom, C.E.; Bergstrom, H.; Forssman, L.; Rigner, A.; Lycke, E.: Vaccination against rubella of newly delivered women, Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 5: 237-241, 1973.

11. Grillner, L.: Neutralizing antibodies after rubella vaccination of newly delivered women: a comparison between three vaccines, Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 7: 169-172, 1975.

12. Lalla, M.; Vesikari, T.; Virolainen, M.: Lymphoblast proliferation and humoral antibody response after rubella vaccination, Clin. Exp. Immunol. 15: 193-202, 1973.

13. Ogra, P.L.; Kerr-Grant, D.; Umana, G.; Dzierba, J.; Weintraub, D.: Antibody response in serum and nasopharynx after naturally acquired and vaccine-induced infection with rubella virus, N. Engl. J. Med. 285: 1333-1339, 1971.

14. Measles, Mumps, and Rubella — Vaccine Use and Strategies for Elimination of Measles, Rubella, and Congenital Rubella Syndrome and Control of Mumps: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), MMWR 47(RR-8): May 22, 1998. 33. Rubella Prevention: Recommendation of the Immunization Practices Advisory Committee (ACIP), MMWR 39(RR-15): 1-18, November 23, 1990.

15. King, G.E.; Markowitz, L.E.; Patriarca, P.A.; et al: Clinical Efficacy of Measles Vaccine During the 1990 Measles Epidemic, Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 10(12): 883-888, December 1991.

16. Kelso, J.M.; Jones, R.T.; Yunginger, J.W.: Anaphylaxis to measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine mediated by IgE to gelatin, J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 91: 867-872, 1993.

17. Center for Disease Control: Immunization of Children Infected with Human T-Lymphotropic Virus Type III/Lymphadenopathy-Associated Virus, Annals of Internal Medicine, 106: 75-78, 1987.

18. Krasinski, K.; Borkowsky, W.; Krugman, S.: Antibody following measles immunization in children infected with human T-cell lymphotropic virus-type III/lymphadenopathy associated virus (HTLV-III/LAV) [Abstract]. In: Program and abstracts of the International Conference on Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, Paris, France, June 23-25, 1986. 11 19. Bitnum, A.; et al: Measles Inclusion Body Encephalitis Caused by the Vaccine Strain of Measles Virus. Clin. Infect. Dis. 29: 855-861, 1999.

20. Angel, J.B.; et al: Vaccine Associated Measles Pneumonitis in an Adult with AIDS. Annals of Internal Medicine, 129: 104-106, 1998.

21. Starr, S.; Berkovich, S.: The effect of measles, gamma globulin modified measles, and attenuated measles vaccine on the course of treated tuberculosis in children, Pediatrics 35: 97-102, January 1965.

22. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System — United States, MMWR 39(41): 730-733, October 19, 1990.

23. Rubella vaccination during pregnancy — United States, 1971-1981. MMWR 31(35): 477-481, September 10, 1982.

24. Losonsky, G.A.; Fishaut, J.M.; Strussenber, J.; Ogra, P.L.: Effect of immunization against rubella on lactation products. II. Maternal-neonatal interactions, J. Infect. Dis. 145: 661-666, 1982.

25. Landes, R.D.; Bass, J.W.; Millunchick, E.W.; Oetgen, W.J.: Neonatal rubella following postpartum maternal immunization, J. Pediatr. 97: 465-467, 1980.

26. Lerman, S.J.: Neonatal rubella following postpartum maternal immunization, J. Pediatr. 98: 668, 1981. (Letter)

27. Gershon, A.; et al: Live attenuated rubella virus vaccine: comparison of responses to HPV-77-DE5 and RA 27/3 strains, Am. J. Med. Sci. 279(2): 95-97, 1980.

28. Bennetto, L; Scolding, N. Inflammatory/post-infectious encephalomyelitis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2004;75(Suppl 1):i22- 8.

29. Fenichel, GM. Neurological complications of immunization. AnnNeurol 1982;12(2):119-28.